Comcast Customers Will Begin Having Their Mobile Data Throttled

We still don’t and won’t block, throttle or discriminate against lawful content. We’re still not creating fast lanes. We still don’t have plans to enter into so-called paid prioritization agreements.”
— Comcast Cable CEO Dave Watson, June 2018, via PhillyMag

Less than one month after Comcast and other internet service providers proclaimed that they would not throttle customers' internet after net neutrality is dismantled, Comcast is.....wait for it....throttling customer's mobile internet usage. Again.

Comcast said, "the company will begin throttling all video streams to 480p resolution, which will become the default resolution for streaming video through cellular data." Customers streaming via WiFi, however, will not be affected. 


Comcast will roll out a package that will allow customers to pay for 720p resolution. Comcast's Xfinity Mobile customers using the Unlimited Data Plan can also look forward to being capped at 600kbps. Comcast, a huge proponent of dismantling net neutrality laws because he believed them to be "too restrictive" took less than one month to renege on his self-proclaimed "commitment to net neutrality."

So, how will Comcast rope customers into paying for 720p? They're going to allow current customers to continue to stream at 720p at no additional cost, then announce the price change and charge customers to continue to stream at the higher quality 720p.

Charter Communications also launched a mobile broadband service and will throttle videos to 480p while offering customers to a package for 720p. Ars Technica shows that both Comcast and Charter Communication have similar mobile broadband services and pricing. Both companies' unlimited plans are $45, capping data at 600kbps. For their limited plans, Comcast charges $12 for each gigabyte of usage while Charter charges $14 for each gigabyte.

CalMatters' Antoinette Siu reported that The State of California is looking to take on the FCC by reinstating a state net neutrality bill that was gutted in June but has since been renegotiated. Senator Scott Wiener of San Fransisco said, "We know that the federal government is not going to fix things in the foreseeable future.” Hopefully, more states will follow California's example and draft bills to instate net neutrality laws so that ISPs won't be able to take advantage of consumers.

Perhaps more people would have fought to preserve net neutrality if they knew just what net neutrality was and how losing it could affect their daily lives. At present, this will only affect mobile data users on Comcast's Xfinity and Charter Communications Mobile. But it's only a matter of time before a package for home services is impacted.

Are you surprised that ISPs are beginning to go back on their word? Let us know in the comments.

RIP, Net Neutrality. But It's Not Over, Yet!

Net Neutrality Repeal Goes Into Effect Today

Cover illustration by Ammy Daroach.

While we're all excited about E3, the repeal of net neutrality goes into effect Monday June 11. Engadget's Mallory Locklear breaks down what happens next. While ISPs may not implement anything immediately, they now have the legal ability "leeway to block, throttle and prioritize websites and content." This would not be the first time ISPs have done this, which is why the Obama Administration reclassified internet service providers as Title II. 

Understanding Title II can be a bit tricky, which is why too many people are ignoring such an important policy.

What is Title II? 

Title II refers to services that carry goods to others. Think about the U.S. Postal Service, railroads and ferries. They carry mail and deliver on behalf of businesses and individuals. They transport (or carry) for the common people. It's where the term "common carrier"originated from. This also means that the service provider or carrier, must charge everyone the same price for the same service.

The internet, like mail carriers, has evolved into a service that carries common information and should be regulated as such. Just as mail services deliver packages on behalf of businesses and individuals, schools now deliver education online, people pay bills online, sign up for various services online, make reservations, and communicate with loved ones online. Reclassifying internet service providers to Title I services would mean that ISPs could prioritize which websites people can visit and for how much. 

Although net neutrality officially ends today, the battle is still pressing on. The House of Representatives is still preparing to vote to reinstate net neutrality. You can help by contacting your representatives--either tweet them or call them or both! Let them know where you stand.

Let us know in the comments where you stand and if you've talked to your representatives.

Understanding Net Neutrality

When I lived and worked in the Middle East, certain internet sites were blocked because they violated the countries' laws (pornographic sites, gambling sites, certain video game sites, streaming sites, etc.). Here, in the U.S. our internet service providers or ISPs are required by law, to not block any webites for any reasons. In otherwords, the internet is to remain open and companies are not allowed to block sites in order to get customers to pay more.

In 2015, the Federal Communication Commission or FCC reclassified high speed internet as a public utility--a public good, including it in Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. That means they internet service providers are considered a "common carrier". Net Neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers ISPs should allow access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. 

What is Net Neutrality?

Net neutrality is actually quite simple. Net neutrality is keeping the internet open by requiring all data be considered equal. Thus, forbidding ISPs from blocking certain traffick or slowing down internet speed in order to charge higher prices. Politicians, however, have severely complicated the issue with rhetoric and misinformation. Scientific American gave an excellent explanation:

It's the idea that all Internet data should be equal. That the Comcasts and Verizons of the world can provide the pipes but should have no say in what passes through them. The Internet providers shouldn't be allowed to charge different companies more or less for their data or to slow down, or block, access to Web sites and services they don't like.

Argument For Net Neutrality Laws

Supporters of Net Neutrality believe:

  • Net neutrality promotes innovation in tech, allowing a free and open internet that is accessible to everyone

  • Net neutrality protects consumers/users by preventing ISPs from selecting websites to block or throttle data. If ISPs are allowed free reign, it is probable that they will try a few things they've already tried in the past, including:

  • Net neutrality allows small ISPs to compete with large ISPs through innovation

Argument Against Net Neutrality

Opponents of Net Neutrality believe that:

  • Not all data is equal and companies should pay their fair share of the internet.

  • Internet companies like Netflix and Skype are taking up too much data.

  • Open internet stifles competition and innovation.

  • Shouldn't have government involvement.

Those who are opposed to Net Neutrality argue that consumers' fears of ISPs abusing their power is unfounded. History, unfortunately, proves otherwise. FreePress compiled a list of Net Neutrality violations by ISPs like Comcast, Verizon and AT&T, doing the very thing they want us to believe they would never do. These violations include throttling data, blocking ports and websites and redirecting internet users to the browser of their choosing.

In January 2017, the FCC's policy to uphold the laws of Net Neutrality shifted with the appointment of Ajit Pai as chairman of the FCC. Pai, who served as a lawyer and lobbyist for Verizon seems to still be protecting Verizon's interests and not the U.S. the interests of consumers and businesses. Almost immediately after his appointment, Pai got to work on repealing Net Neutrality. And on December 14, 2017, Congress voted to repeal the internet's Title II status, reversing net neutrality. Luckily, Pai has yet to finalize the repeal. This gave the U.S. Senate time to vote on May 16, 2018, to reverse the vote to repeal Net Neutrality. I know. It's a lot. 

What the Senate Vote Means

The U.S. Senate voted 52-47 to put the FCC's Net Neutrality rules back in place. This doesn't mean that Net Neutrality is law of the land once again. The House of Representatives also have to vote on it. It's unlikely, however, that it will pass the House because of the $101 million ISPs Verizon, AT&T and Comcast contributed to politicians campaigns and PACs. 

If you're still unsure of how Net Neutrality will affect you directly, imagine having to choose your internet like this:

Source:  This is not a real Verizon package, only a visualization of what a package could look like should Net Neutrality be eliminated.

This is not a real Verizon package, only a visualization of what a package could look like should Net Neutrality be eliminated.

Small businesses could be charged exorbitant fees to build websites on WordPress, Squarespace. Video game prices could rise because of the reliance on online gameplay. This in addition to consumers having to pay more for an internet package that will allow them to play video games.

The laws that govern ISPs are very necessary in order to preserve a free and fair internet. And this is where we need your help to ensure our internet remains free and equal. Vote. Midterm elections are vastly approaching. If you support keeping the internet open, vote out those politicians who would see Net Neutrality dismantled. 

Tell us what you think about Net Neutrality in the comments.