Standing up to bullying and harassment in video games should be a goal worthy of the gaming community's support. But after Bully Hunter's live stream on April 13, they've encountered the behavior that their organization was created to fight.
When Ge'NeL first learned about the creation of the BullyHunters, we wanted show our support for an organization standing up to harassment. BullyHunters' was cloaked in mystery until it's launch. Their teaser video did just that--teased, offering no details except that women gamers are tired of the casual sexism and harassment that's treated as if its supposed to be normal and accepted by everyone. Like everyone else, Ge'NeL had to wait until their first live stream for more details.
BullyHunters seeks to address the growing problem of in-game harassment and bullying. The premise is " to connect victims of bullying with elite gamers who can come to their defense in real time." It's almost like a buddy system. If you're being harassed in game, you hit the button and ask for a hunter to come to your aid. Their purpose isn't to harass the bully. Their purpose is to offer assistance. Someone to have your back. Despite the message, BullyHunters is facing swift backlash online for a myriad of reasons.
Reasons for Backlash
During their live stream, there was a mixture of support, uncertainty, expected trolling and the behavior that Bully Hunters was created to fight. Afterward, Twitter was aflutter with talk of BullyHunters' stream. While some called it a "trend" others called it a scam. The data that BullyHunters used was not thoroughly researched and may have been extremely exaggerated or made up. We attempted to verify the given sources but ended up with more questions than answered.
"21 Million female gamers..."
BullyHunters claimed that "21 million female gamers have experienced sex-based taunting, harassment or threats while playing video games online." This number was based on an article written in 2012 that surveyed 874 women. Then, BullyHunters exaggerated the figures based on market size estimates. BullyHunters named YouGov as its source, but did not provide a link to the survey for this particular statistic. Ge'NeL was unable to find any such research to verify this statistic.
"Over 3 million female gamers have quit a game because of harassment"
Again, these figures are based on market size projections (estimations) in relation to the 874 women polled in the 2012 article. The BullyHunters quotes, but misrepresents the quote with the omission of the word "temporary." They also greatly exaggerated the "874 women" in the study via the PriceCharting blog. What's more concerning about the information that BullyHunters cited is that, when one Twitter user, Platinum, asked about the figures, she was dismissed and blocked due to being an "inter-misogynist". Platinum, a mental health researcher, deciphered BullyHunter's stats in a blog post.
People thought the platform wasn't inclusive to men
Male gamers claimed the platform was biased against men and took offense to not being included. Some pleaded that "men experience more harassment than women," information likely seen or quoted from PEW Research Center that said, "Overall, men are slightly more likely to experience any form of online harassment (44% vs. 37% of women)". For women, however, harassment isn't about name-calling; It's about being respected as a human being. That same study conducted by PEW found that "among adults ages 18 to 29, women are more than twice as likely as men to report experiencing sexual harassment online (21% vs. 9%). And among the youngest adults – those ages 18 to 24 – women are more than three times as likely to be sexually harassed online (20% vs. 6% of men)." It's a very serious problem that some men and women do not care to address.
Viewers of the live-stream thought the in-game harassers were fake
After watching the video several times after the live stream, it's very possible that the CS:GO matches were scripted. Ge'NeL has no way of knowing this for certain. A possible explanation for being scripted or in a custom match is to demonstrate how the BullyHunters platform works, which would have been acceptable had they disclosed that the matches were either scripted or customized for demonstration purposes.
"They're just bullies themselves"
After their video demonstration of how BullyHunters works, critics of the campaign felt as if the Bullyhunters were just bullying the bullies, which solves nothing. Critics also shared a year-old tweet with Bullyhunter spokesperson, ZombieUnicorn exhibiting behavior akin to those bullying. Though, after reading the tweet, it is clear that ZombieUnicorn was defending herself.
A general lack of understanding of the severity of online harassment, especially in video games.
What's more disheartening, however, is the way critics have responded to the BullyHunters, their misinformation and their existence in general. People have different ideas of what harassment is and expressed difficulty in understanding the difference between typical in-game shit-talking versus flat out harassment. Many began harassing BullyHunters' partners via Twitter--their behavior actually displaying why women gamers are trying to fight online bullying to begin with.
Most male gamers do not believe harassment in online gaming is a "thing". And those who do mis-characterize it as name-calling and don't think it's a big deal. And that's part of the problem that people fighting against in-game harassment are facing. People who dare speak up against in-game harassment are called white knights, social justice warriors, feminists or feminazis and worse in order to detract from actually addressing the problem.
While people can easily hit the ignore/block button, ignoring the problem does not solve the problem. When you hit the ignore button, the offending person think's he or she has won and will take his or her behavior to someone else. However, when people speak up and stand up to bullying, letting the offender(s) know that that behavior is not okay, there is more of a chance for that person to stop the offending behavior and not continue or at least try to correct their own behavior in the future. That is the importance of speaking up and standing up for others.
These mistakes by BullyHunters led to, not only the backlash, but their partners pulling their sponsorship and the BullyHunters' website being taken down. SteelSeries issued a statement, though, issuing false statistics of their own in order to combat the backlash they received due to their affiliation with BullyHunters. Diverse Gaming Coalition went so far as to throw ZombiUnicorn and SteelSeries under the bus.
Diverse Gaming Coalition went so far as to throw ZombiUnicorn and SteelSeries under the bus.
All in all, the BullyHunters' intention to combat in-game bullying is noble. However, they lacked professionalism of thorough research, transparency in their actions and inclusiveness of male gamers who are also subjected to various forms of harassment. BullyHunters missed out on a great opportunity to gain male allies because they, themselves, didn't quite understand the data and, therefore, manipulated it in order to make a point. And that backfired.
What do you think about the BullyHunters campaign? Do you think they can recover from the backlash? Or do you think it's game over? Let us know in the comments.
Bullying and harassment in the gaming community are plagues that continue to spread throughout the gaming community. While both men and women are victims of bullying, women are more likely to be sexually harassed, threatened with rape or other forms of sexual violence. While developers and social platforms are finally beginning to address the issues of online harassment, there is still more to be done.
I recently played Overwatch and stayed teamed up with a few guy players after we wiped the floor with the opposing team. We began talking in on Blizzard's voice chat. When we got into the next match, one of the guys, a 13 year old boy, on our team became angry at another player who had admitted to being new to the game. The 13 year old proceeded to call the new player bad, berating her. Before I could even say anything, our teammate jumped in to correct his behavior. "Yo! We're not having that toxic shit on our team. Everyone starts out not playing that well. There's no need for name calling, man." And you know what? That kid apologized! But of the many times I've witnessed such bad behavior, that was the very first time I was witness to a man stepping in to correct another guy's bad behavior online.
But of the many times I've witnessed such bad behavior, that was the very first time I was witness to a man stepping in to correct another guy's bad behavior online. Even when I had joined a CS:GO game to play with my so-called friend. I hadn't played CS:GO before but my friend wanted me to play with him. Almost immediately, I'm asking my friend questions and one of the guys in voice said "Must be a girl." Another guy chimed in "Yeah, probably a n*gger girl." The other guys laughed. My "friend" who was streaming was passive and just said "come on guys, that's not nice." I left the game, not only disappointed with those toxic, racist fucks, but in my so called friend. I haven't been able to play with him since. By being passive, we allow people to think this behavior is okay. And it's not okay!
That wasn't the first time nor the last that I've encountered racism and sexism while gaming online. As a Twitch streamer, I've been told to "show me your n*gger tits" and "wow a n*gger trying to play video games" and "another game whore". This has to stop.
This why I and many other women gamers are taking a stand with Bully Hunters. We're tired of being told to "Just ignore it," which ultimately allows the harassers to just go and do it to someone else. We're tired of being told to "get over it". We're tired of being expected to be passive and not fight back because of the detriment it has done to other women who have stood up for themselves only to receive incredible backlash. We're tired of our supposed guy friends not having our backs. We're tired of guys not checking their bros when they exhibit abusive behavior toward anyone.
Though we're not sure what we will see at the unveiling of Bully Hunters, their mission of standing up for others is one we can get behind.
Will you join us at Bully Hunter's Facebook Event on April 12, 2018 @ 7:00PM EST?
The woman-led, woman-centric dating app, Bumble, repeatedly declined Match Group's offer to buy. Now Match Group is suing for patent infringement.
In Forbes December 2017 issue, Bumble founder Whitney Wolfe Herd made the "30 Under 30" list, with Bumble being worth $1 billion. Bumble has over 18 million registered users, with more than 1 billion matches made since its launch. And Match Group is the parent company for Match.com, Tinder, PlentyOfFish, OkCupid and HowAboutWe. Naturally, Match Group would want to acquire the dating app that's giving them a serious run for their money.
While Match Group's attempt to buy out Bumble looks like nothing more than business as usual, the history between Match Group and Bumble is anything but. Herd, then just Wolfe, was one of the co-founders of Tinder along with four other co-founders, including then-CMO Justin Mateen. In 2014, Wolfe sued for sexual harassment and the receipts Herd shared paint a pretty horrifying picture of what she had to endure during her tenure at Tinder. Here are the receipts straight from the lawsuit.
The deposition shows that Herd and Mateen dated briefly. However, the texts show that their relationship was one where Herd was constantly being accused of flirting or cheating. Even Herd's description of how they, allegedly, first began dating is problematic af: Mateen summoned her over to his house because he was distraught about an ex-girlfriend. When Herd refused, he told her that he would be very upset with her at work. Even though she complained to partner and then CEO Sean Rad about Mateen, Herd's pleas for Rad to do something about Mateen went ignored, save for him calling Mateen "nuts" and instead called Herd "emotional" and "dramatic." The lawsuit was eventually settled out of court with no admission of wrongdoing on either side. The evidence, though is quite to the contrary. Rad was forced to step down as CEO, but was reinstated after five months.
In 2017 Match Group, where Rad is still chairman of Tinder and very influential, tried to acquire Bumble for $450 million, even though Bumble is worth $1 billion. Bumble turned down the offer, but Match Group came back with a $1 billion offer, even though the group does not have the cash on hand.
Now, Match Group is suing Bumble for patent infringement--the design patent for Tinder’s swipe-to-connect feature. Bumble's response to the lawsuit?
hough both Bumble and Tinder dating apps allow seekers to swipe right for yes and left for no, Bumble's app is more woman-friendly, requiring the woman to make the first move should she and her potential both swipe right for each other. Bumble has also added BumbleBFF to help people find friends in their area as well as BumbleBiz for networking relationships.
Suing for patent infringement could be a way for Match Group to intimidate Bumble into joining the groups already growing number of dating apps. But Match Group has to know that after having a partner not check a coworker--nay, fellow co-founder for sexual harassment, why would Herd want Bumble to be associated with anything that has to do with them? It just goes to show that they still don't understand that no means no and corporate bullying doesn't make anyone want to say yes.
Say it ain't so, Stan!
The Daily Mail has learned that multiple women have accused Stan Lee of sexual harassment in his Hollywood Hills home. The women, all nurses, work for the same nursing home, which caters to the Hollywood elite.
Lee, 95, is said to have "asked for oral sex in the shower, walked around naked and wanted to be 'pleasured' in the bedroom. The nursing company, who has not been identified, claims "that Stan has sexually harassed every single nurse that has been to the house."
Tom Lallas, Stan Lee's attorney said in a statement to DailyMail.com: 'Mr. Lee categorically denies these false and despicable allegations and he fully intends to fight to protect his stellar good name and impeccable character." Instead of filing a police report or a civil suit, the women of the nursing home have demanded payment or they will take their story to the media. Lallas says that "Mr Lee will not be extorted or blackmailed, and will pay no money to anyone because he has done absolutely nothing wrong."
Julie Wozniak, a representative for his current nursing company, Vitale Nursing, Inc has said that "Lee has been nothing but 'polite, kind and respectful' since they took over.
Amid the sexual harassment allegations, TMZ learned that Lee's staff discovered that someone had written a check for $300,000 to his partner organization, Hands of Respect LLC without Lee's knowledge or consent. Beverly Hills Police Department is investigating and it's believed that someone inside the organization forged the check to keep the money for him/herself. TMZ also also discovered that someone used $850,000 of Lee's money to buy a condo in West Hollywood.
Joan Lee, Stan Lee's wife of 69 years, passed away July 7, 2017.